Skip to main content

The story of Chloe Nelson receiving her late twin sister’s donor bone represents far more than a medical procedure—it illuminates how organ donation creates profound connections that challenge our understanding of life, death, and healing. When Chloe fell from that hunting tree stand, breaking her leg in what doctors called a “pilon fracture,” the universe opened an unexpected door: the chance to carry her twin sister Faith with her in the most literal sense. This remarkable case demonstrates why we need to dramatically expand our conversations about organ donation beyond just major organs to include tissue, bone, and other life-enhancing donations.

The Invisible Side of Organ Donation We Rarely Discuss

Most public discourse around organ donation focuses exclusively on life-saving organs—hearts, lungs, kidneys—while tissue donation remains in the shadows despite its extraordinary impact. Dr. Bellamy’s statement that “most people don’t think about bone as being something that gets donated, but it’s used every day” exposes a critical gap in public awareness. This oversight matters tremendously. According to the American Association of Tissue Banks, a single tissue donor can enhance the lives of more than 75 people, yet tissue donation consent rates lag behind organ donation because families simply don’t understand its importance.

The Nelson family’s story demonstrates how these “secondary” donations create healing beyond the physical. For Chloe, receiving her twin’s bone wasn’t just about repairing her leg—it represented continuation of their twin bond in a tangible form. Her statement that “it’s just another way of me carrying her with me wherever I go” reveals the profound psychological healing that can occur when donation creates these connections.

Twin Connections Challenge Our Understanding of Identity

The twin relationship between Faith and Chloe adds another dimension to this story that deserves deeper examination. The “twin connection” Chloe references—”something that’s strong and I think only twins understand it”—takes on new meaning when part of one twin literally becomes incorporated into the other’s body. This raises fascinating questions about identity, continuity, and the boundaries between individuals.

Research on twin relationships consistently shows deeper connections than typical sibling bonds. A 2018 study in the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships found that twins report higher levels of intimacy and emotional closeness than non-twin siblings. When this connection extends beyond death through tissue donation, it creates a unique psychological framework for processing grief. For Chloe, the knowledge that Faith’s bone is literally becoming part of her own skeleton—”the body basically fills that in with your own bone”—represents a biological continuation of their connection that few people ever experience.

Organ Donation as Grief Therapy

The Nelson family’s extraordinary resilience in the face of losing two daughters deserves particular attention. After losing their eldest daughter Maddy to childhood cancer in 2016, and then Faith in a snowmobile accident on New Year’s Day 2023, the family could have collapsed under the weight of such tragedy. Instead, they’ve channeled their grief into purpose through the Maddy Nelson Memorial Foundation and the Walk by Faith Gala.

Their experience highlights how organ donation provides a powerful framework for processing grief. Studies from the Center for Organ Recovery and Education show that more than 90% of donor families report that donation helped in their grief journey. This isn’t surprising when we consider that donation transforms an ending into a continuation—it gives meaning to loss by creating healing for others.

For the Nelsons, this meaning-making took an extraordinary turn when Faith’s donation directly benefited her twin sister. Karen Nelson’s determination to track down her daughter’s bone tissue—even getting surgery postponed until it could be located—demonstrates how the possibility of this connection became a mission that gave purpose to her grief.

The Medical System Must Better Support These Connections

Dr. Bellamy’s statement that “It’s the first time I’ve ever had somebody request that or even have to do that” reveals a significant gap in our medical system. While privacy protections in organ donation serve important purposes, they can also prevent meaningful connections between donors and recipients. The fact that the Nelson family had to undertake extraordinary efforts to track down Faith’s tissue suggests the need for more flexible systems that can accommodate these healing connections when both parties desire them.

Organizations like the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) have strict protocols limiting direct donation to prevent coercion or favoritism in organ allocation. However, tissue donation operates under different constraints since storage is possible and matching requirements are less stringent. The medical community should develop clearer pathways for families to request directed tissue donation to loved ones when medically appropriate, recognizing the profound healing such connections can provide.

Alternative Perspectives: The Importance of Anonymity

Some medical ethicists argue that anonymity in donation serves crucial purposes. It prevents recipients from feeling undue obligation to donor families and protects families from disappointment if transplants fail. These concerns are valid but fail to account for cases like the Nelsons’, where the relationship already exists and both parties actively seek the connection.

Others might question whether the psychological benefit Chloe experiences from knowing the bone came from Faith might be a placebo effect—after all, one donor’s bone is medically identical to another’s. This perspective misses the point entirely. The healing that occurs through these connections transcends the physical. Whether or not Faith’s bone heals Chloe’s leg differently than another donor’s would have, the knowledge creates meaning that supports emotional healing alongside physical recovery.

The power of Chloe’s statement—”I know she helped other people with her loss and her donations. But it was really comforting being one of those people that were helped”—cannot be dismissed as mere sentiment. It represents a profound form of continuing bonds that psychology increasingly recognizes as healthy grief processing.

Expanding Our Vision of Donation’s Impact

The Nelson family’s experience should inspire a broader conversation about organ and tissue donation that goes beyond clinical outcomes to embrace the full spectrum of healing these gifts provide. Their story demonstrates that donation isn’t just about extending or improving life in a medical sense—it’s about creating connections that help both recipients and donor families find meaning and continuity in the face of loss.

As we consider policies and practices around donation, we must make space for these extraordinary connections while continuing to ensure ethical allocation of limited resources. The Walk by Faith Gala’s support of Lifesource to highlight organ donation represents exactly the kind of community education needed to expand awareness of donation’s multifaceted benefits.

The fact that Chloe carries on Faith’s pottery passion while literally carrying part of Faith in her healing leg creates a powerful metaphor for how donation works—transforming loss into new creation, absence into presence, ending into continuation. This is the true gift of donation that deserves greater recognition in our medical systems and cultural understanding.